The announce their identity and agency and the

The contentious debate over the
Dream Act Movement in the U.S. is examined from a liberal perspective, focusing
on three major types: identity, power, and rights. This paper will analyze the
importance of the DREAMERS that have played a vital role in the United States
economy.  Following, the advocacy of
undocumented youth to realize the passage of the Development, Relief, and
education for Alien Minors (DREAMER) Act, limited by a bipartisan legislation
that would entitle undocumented youth a pathway to citizenship. Using the
Latino/Hispanic race framework to emphases socio-political that surround the
immigrant debate. Moreover, the ways undocumented youth announce their identity
and agency and the ways they fabricate their demands publicly in the inquiring
passage of the DREAM Act during the years 2001 to 2010. To this extent, they
should not be treated as illegal or underserving individuals. All of them are
competent and well-qualified students who pay taxes and contribute to America
well-being. So over, the DREAM Act can become a vital possibility for these
students and also for their immigrant parents who claim for their U.S

In June 2012, the Obama
administration stated that it would allow undocumented youth meeting certain
eligibility criteria to apply for protection against deportation and in many
cases, a work permit under D.A.C.A. Although, it is a temporary measure with no
direction to citizenship. This announcement brought a major victory for the
immigrant youth movement, which has worked for decades to achieve some sort of
legal status for its undocumented members. In particular, this movement has
struggled for the transition of the Development, Relief, and Education for
Alien Minors Act, or DREAM Act. While it has yet to become law, the DREAM Act
has played an unparalleled role in U.S. political discourse since it was first
proposed in 2001. Above all, it has assembled a new youth movement that asserts
its members’ rights the new terms articulating in society are
“undocumented youth” and “DREAMERS” which are widely used
on college campuses, workplace, in mainstream newspapers, publications, and
including by politicians and celebrities. Many of these immigrant youth
movements have taken their stigmatized undocumented status into a powerful
identity. As a result, “DREAMERS,” undocumented immigrants in their teens,
twenties, and thirties who have reveal their undocumented status in support of
the DREAM Act and have become a recognizable and compelling force in the United
States; despite having no formal political power (Batalova and McHugh, 2010).

It is very genuine and precise how
the immigrant youth movement and DREAMER identity for practical, historical and
theoretical reasons have changed over time. Social movements are an especially
interesting ground of meaning-making decisions because they are actively and
continually producing culture, knowledge, and strategies that challenge
particular opposition and interrelated ideas and ideologies (Yang, 2000). As a
movement speaks for a relatively small population with a stigmatized cumulative
identity and limited access to institutionalized political power. Furthermore,
the construction self-identifying has to invert dominant stereotypes that have
proven to be an important strategy in efforts to passage the DREAM Act. The
term “DREAMER” can be accepted an identity, representing a challenge
to stigmatization and “illegality” on personal and rhetorical levels.
No piece of legislation that social movements are aware considered of primary
leadership and modify undocumented residents. This identity and this movement
have not only been able to confound dominant narratives about undocumented
immigration, but also bring together unlikely allies to support reforms of U.S
immigration laws.

Also, it was brought another
Assembly Bill 540 (AB 540) that passed by the California legislature in 2001
and allowed all residents of California, regardless of immigration status, to
pay in-state tuition at public colleges and universities. The AB 540 Bill was
not only a big step forward and accessible access to attend college for
undocumented youth and the U.S-citizen children of undocumented parents, but
also empowered undocumented students by combating stigmatization.  But it also validated students by
constructing a position that reinforced their claims to higher education and
upward mobility. The term “AB 540 students,” the name given to the
California youth who would benefit from the ruling, was a neutral label, and as
most Californians did not know what it meant, it did not immediately reveal
one’s immigration status. More importantly, it emphasized that these young
people were dedicated students who had rights under United States law, directly
countering discourses of “illegality.” Furthermore, Social movements
have worked so hard to accomplish confidence among the DREAMERS. Organization
and assertiveness of California’s undocumented youth movement are moving away
from justifying access to rights by measuring worthiness according to the
nation- state’s norms and towards articulating rights based on the needs of the
undocumented society, their ties to the community and family, and their mental

The label “AB 540
students” and “DREAMER” play a productive role that provides an
alternative classification to a stigmatized population that connotes ambition,
idealism and promise, which inverts and battle negative stereotypes of
unauthorized immigrants. Most activists embrace a much broader, more inclusive
definition. However, certain activities and events that connect social
movements, for example, civil disobedience, large rallies, enlistment, and
collective decision making are just few approach to maximize rights. These
young people had experienced involvement through these events and have gained
knowledge of what it is to fight for their right in order to preserve their
identity. In other words, there is an increasing awareness that advocates and
communicates the right that remain within, social movements also recognize who
gets left out, marginalized, criminalized and deported.

To be aware of the undocumented
community is the central key to get organize, being accountable to, and for
whom they mobilize. For example, in the article titled, “Disrupting the dream: Undocumented youth reframe citizenship and
deportability through anti-deportation activism,” discusses that one of the
activists lived his own experienced through deportation process, he stated
“Even when it’s someone you don’t know and they get arrested and put in
deportation, I have to be on it. I say, this is basically my brother, this is
part of my community.” This is the responsibility that every immigrant must
feel for their own people and fight together for one reason they both depend
on. These condition that the immigrants including their children even if they
were born in the U.S, they are not absented of rejection, racism, limited
access to public health weakening their power.

In addition, undocumented youth
have found alternative ways to share their experiences, and strategies to
increase visibility, equality, and rights as they engage in decision making,
organizing, and becoming more civically engaged than the social movement itself.
Surprisingly, the university administrators and national advocacy groups are
playing a critical part in the intermediate development of the immigrant youth
movement. As DREAMERS have become more organized, associated, they know they
need to take further control over their journey. There was a time where the
movement became increasingly discouraged with the lawmakers during the argument
over C.I.R- Comprehensive Immigration Reform- in 2010. A few DREAMERS, for
instance, they felt no well represented by the established organization, which
they were led by non-immigrant and exposed to bureaucracy and political
limitations that prevent them from being good candidates. On the other hand, professionalism
is often lack of devotion and determination. Following, the students felt
marginalized and kicked out of the proper decision-making process and left out
with a greater coalition. The immigrant youth movement considers that the Dream
Act should be taken separately from C.I.R for the prospect of these immigrant

 All the events organized by the movement
support for the DREAM Act, including personal stories or the advocacy of being
a DREAMER have made greater impact thought out the last years. These DREAMERS
have great support in New York, California, Chicago, and so on. There was a
rally that took place in New York City in 2010, for example, the DREAMERs not
only exposed their personal stories with the media but also held an enormous
banner affirming, “We are the American Dream” as well as massive notes like,
“Let Us Serve.” Following, with endless miles walking, the fundamental purpose
of these events was sharing stories with other individuals, students, and the
media and also to lawmakers. This kind of events is the aim of empowering other
undocumented young people and take a secret that has limited their movement and
power, and by announcing it to the world and transforming their identity into a
source of power and personal strength. 

Not for being left out, they stress
not only because of their academic achievement, but also the fact that they
were primarily raised in the U.S, similar to their peers and the local
community (Gonzales, 2008). At first glance, this argument seems to be
argumentative for the regimes implemented to the immigrants. Indeed, this is
the way some conservative supporters see the Dream Act. Nevertheless, those
that are involved in the movement have been the most vocal and effective for
C.I.R. Even though, it remains controversial for some DREAMERS who thinks it
could be a bargain. Not to mention, there have been youth activists that have
also protested against the SB 1070 in Arizona, a federal enforcement policy
like deportation.


At LACMA, The Museum of the Stick is a great example of this lively movement
in the United States which the Hispanic society is in. This art embodies Latin
American Culture in every aspect. Every object that is displayed represents
laboring, hunting and gathering, sports, and worshiping idols. However, all
these sources of antique industry which have changed over time. Moreover,
industrialization took over to modernized society regarding the ancestral
background and deprive the identity of the most vulnerable communities, Latin
America. Not only emphasizes the declining loss of identity, history, and
language when the community keep their voice in a mute mode but it also the
oppressors take control of who they are and where they come from. In addition
to this, a great comparison can be “When
Afro becomes like Indigenous: Garifuna and Afro-Indigenous Politics in Honduras”
by Mark Anderson, when neoliberal multiculturalism restricted the
recognition of their cultural difference and ethics rights and entangled
relations between blackness and indigeneity but also it marginalizes them and
cultural rights fails to address structural racism effecting these minorities.
The same effect is addressing the DREAMERs because they don’t feel recognize
even though the alliances they have formed in their struggle for their history
and rights, sometimes lacks political representation.

Furthermore, the disruptive dream
of many immigrant youths in the and their parents in the United States have a
blurry identity, either if they are insiders or outsiders of the sovereign
nation, have affected many. Although, The
Museum of the Stick may appear to be stable, they have changed the ideas
that are reflected in social, political, and right. However, The Museum of The Stick not just shows
us how differently a culture can be, but also it shows how strong can be a
society full of power and determination to fight and break all those barriers
set by those oppressors. This powerful art talks by itself in a great manner
that can promote integrity and empathy for the rights that remain sheer within the
Hispanic society and force the ties of trust within the community and family
and their mental health and to look for a prospective solution among the
immigrant youth.

As it is mention few paragraphs
above in the article titled, “Disrupting
the Dream: Undocumented Youth Reframe Citizenship and Deportability Through
Anti-Deportation Activism” mentions how one group of 1.5 generation
undocumented organizations in Chicago, the Immigrant Youth Justice League
(IYJL) has responded to normative rules of citizenship, especially through the
advocacy against the deportation of individuals who do not fit in hegemonic
models. The Immigrant Youth Justice League has a complex and conceptual landscape
of various states of belonging because it approaches with different living
experiences in the Hispanic community. Moreover, this organization focus on how
they frame responses to federal deportation policies.

This organization takes place in
the context of a movement led by undocumented 1.5 generation youth whose
tactics have included first-person testimony and civil disobedience. Also,
there are plenty of dedicated organizations that help immigrants and refugees
that need support. This is significant because the I.J.Y.L place the
undocumented at the front line of the national talk on immigration. Young
undocumented activists that fight daily for their rights has increased
dramatically and they also fight for the rights of other people who do not fit
nation-state boundary for legal status or easing deportation. Undocumented
organizations are moving away from the comfort zone and making better access to
right by measuring worthiness according to the nation-state’s norms and towards
articulating rights based on the needs of each undocumented immigrant, their
ties to the community and family, and their mental health. This is a great
awareness that can promote and emphasize the right of some to remain within.
However, they are some that are left out, marginalized, criminalized and
deported because of their fear to be known in society.

Additionally, more powerful impacts
are making these young undocumented immigrants in telling their personal
stories and exposing it to the public so can everyone know what they have been
through at an early age of their life. Adding to this, participating in civil
disobedience, like fighting individual deportation; this is not changing law
enforcement and deportation policies. Perhaps is the most powerful of a
challenge for the Hispanic community to gain power and diminish the fear that
they feel through such situation. This tactics and political work of the
undocumented 1.5 generation continues to evolve.