This enough on what an individual wants. Under

This
critical appraisal aims to position the five-factor model within the
multifaceted field of personality psychology by highlighting six important
limitations of the model. These are the model’s (an) inability to address core constructs of personality
functioning beyond the level of traits; (b)
limitations with respect to the prediction of specific behavior and the
adequate description of personal’ lives; (c)
failure to provide compelling causal explanations for human behavior and
experience; (d) disregard of the
contextual and conditional nature of human experience; (e) failure to offer an attractive program for studying
personality organization and integration; and (f) reliance on simple, no contingent, and implicitly
comparative statements about persons. The five-factor model is essentially a
“psychology of the stranger,” providing information about persons that one
would need to know when one knows nothing else about them. It is argued that
because of inherent limitations, the Big Five may be viewed as one important
model in personality studies
but not the integrative model of personality. (Mccrae, John O.P., 1992)

B.F. Skinner is a major contributor to the Behavioral Theory
of personality, a theory that states that our learning is shaped by positive
and negative reinforcement, punishment, modeling, and observation. Behaviorists also feel that are
personality is established by these learned responses, which help individuals
develop habits. These habits become so deep-seated
in people that individually start to enlist
in them accordingly, which
leads to patterns of behavior that form one’s personality (Cicarelli &
White, 2011) Behaviorism is sometimes described by other theorists as being too
focused with the outer world and not
enough on what an individual wants. Under this theory, people do not have as much control of their own future operating as just a by-product
of whatever their environment presents
at this moment in time. The
needs, desires, wants, and the intent of
person are not focused on as much as theories, such as Carl Roger’s or Abraham
Maslow’s Humanism Theory, which gives more control to the individual.

We Will Write a Custom Essay Specifically
For You For Only $13.90/page!


order now

            In conclusion, in deference to these personality
theories, one must watch whether or
not the behavior is deterministic or if it is free will of the individual. Behaviorism
focuses on the individual’s behavior and believes that the environment shapes
the personality. Humanism looks at the
individual learning self- realization and free will.
These theories both provide strong aspects
of the study of human behavior and personality. On one hand, you have free
will, on the other hand, there is no free will. Each theory offers
approaches that accept the scientific method or denies  it and points out the significance of either the nature or the nurture importance on human behavior.  Albert Bandura Bandura’s social
learning theory signifies the concern of observational learning,
imitation and modeling while merging
a constant interaction between behaviors, personal factors – including
cognition – and the environment referred to as reciprocal causation model.
Both environment and plasticity are important characteristics of social cognitive
theory impacting a person’s
behavior. Albert Bandura social learning theories use both classical
conditioning and operant conditioning. Any theory there are both strengths and restricts  to Albert Bandura’s Social Cognitive Theory. Hostility, sorrow, and phobias are the primary
thought in Bandura’s triadic reciprocal causation theory but maybe one of the biggest strengths
of Bandura and his theory is that he credits
 that people are knowledgeable of learning new behaviors throughout their lives,
which is quite encouraging.

x

Hi!
I'm Johnny!

Would you like to get a custom essay? How about receiving a customized one?

Check it out